Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00071
Original file (FD 2014 00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD H EARING RECORD
NAME: OF SE:RV ICE MEM BE:R (LAST, FIRST M IDDLE IN ITIA L)
CR/\ 0£    A FSNISSAN


RECORD REVIEW

 CUUNSt:L         NA IE OF COUNSEL ANO OR ORGAN 17*\ TION   AODRt:SS ANO OR ORGANl7ATI ON OFCOUNSEL

 1-- ---.- ---1
 \
ES
x
(b) (6)  (b) (6)

MEMBER SITTING   HON








A42.00



VOTE OFTHEBOARD

GEN      UOTl lC'         OTHER

x x x
x
x
E:XlllBITS SUBMITI'EJ) TO Tll E BOARD




OF:NY



















llf.ARINC 01\TE

16 Oct 2014      FD-2014-00071
ORDER APPOINTINO Ti ii' BOARD
2 Al'PLICArlON FOR Rl VltW OF DI SC! I ARGE
3 LE ITER OF NOi IFICJ\l I ON
4 llRltF OF PERSONNEL Fi ll;
COUNSEL"S RloLEt\SE IU·1 1IE llOAIUJ
ADDll IONAI. tXlllBI TS SUBMITrED /\T ·1 1ME OF
PERSONAL J\PPE/\R/\NCE
TAPE RECORDING OF l'ERSONAL /\PPE/\R:\NCE II EARING

APPLICANT.$ ISSUE ANO TllE OOARD'S DE.CIS ONAl.RATIO'IAT.E ARG DlSCUSSED ON TllE AfTA('BEJ) A IR FOR.CG OISCHAACE RUV JC.W 00Ak0 DECISIONAL RATIONAL,G..

Case heard in Wash ington, D.C.

Ad, ise applicant of the decision of t he Board, t he right to a persona l appearance wi t h/without counsel, a nd the right to submit an application to the A FBCM R.

Names and votes wi ll be made ava ilable to the applicant at the applicant 's request.












TO:




S/\ F1MR8R
550 ( STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOt.Pll AFB. TX 78150,--17..J

INDORSEM£N'I



FROI:

DATE: 10/1712014

SECRETARY Of 'nlE A IR FORO; Pf;R SOSNt;l. \ OllSCll. AIR FORct OISCll;1RCE RE\ I E\\ B01\ RI)
1 3;COIMAND DR. EE WING.•lRIJ FLOOR ANORf.WS Mil. 10 2076!-7001


AFHQ FORJ\I 0-2077,JAN 00
(Ef -V2)         Previous






AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE		 CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00071

GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Andrews AFB on 16 Oct 2014.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief


ISSUE: The applicant received an Honorable discharge for personality/adjustment disorder.

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts respon sibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of govenunental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.

Applicant contends the discharge has issues of impropriety due to her bei ng misdiagnosed with adjustment and personality disorder. The records indicated the applicant received a mental health evaluation on 25-29 March 1999, which resu lted in a diagnosis of adjustment disorder with depressed mood and personality disorder. The applicant was found to have maladaptive behavior that significantly impaired her abil i ty to function in a military environment. The applicant's condition was substantiated with a thorough assessment and documentation ; however the Board opined that with current standards of evaluation, it would have been more equitable to refer the applicant to a Medical Eval uation Board. Specifically, Section E4. l 3. J .4 of DoDI 1332.38 , revised 10 April 20 I 3, states that Chronic Adjustment Disorders are no longer considered a
basis for administrative separation. Based on this find ing, Secretarial Authority wou ld be a more appropriate narnti ve reason for discharge.

CONCLUS ION : The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was inconsistent with cutTent procedura l and substanti ve requi rements of the discharge regulation and finds the applicant was not provided full administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that the reason for the discharge is more accuratel y described as Secretarial Authority


Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00071

    Original file (FD-2014-00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDH EARINGRECORDNAME:OFSE:RVICEMEMBE:R (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIA L)CR/\0£ A FSNISSANRECORDREVIEWCUUNSt:L1-- ---.- ---1NAIEOFCOUNSELANOORORGAN17*\ TIONAODRt:SSANOORORGANl7AT IONOFCOUNSELt-\_ES--+- No----1(b) ( 6) x A42.00GEN UOTllC' OTHERE:XlllBITSSUBMITI'EJ)TO TllEBOARD llf.ARINC 01\TE 16 Oct2014 FD-2014-00071 ORDERAPPOINTINOTiii'BOARD2 Al'PLICArlONFORRl VltWOF DISC!I ARGE3 LEITEROFNOiIFICJ\lION4 llRltFOFPERSONNEL Fill;COUNSEL"SRloLEt\SE IU·1...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00548

    Original file (FD 2014 00548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorableTheapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingto thedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof the discharge. ISSUE: Applicantreceiveda Generaldischargefor Misconduct-Conductprejudicialto goodorder and discipl...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00019

    Original file (FD-2015-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable;achangetothenarrativereasonandachangetothereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors lead ingto the discharge. FINDJNG: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof the discharge;reasonandauthorityfor discharge andchangeofreenlistmentcode. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00494

    Original file (FD-2014-00494.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon the availableservicerecord. The attached brief containsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00560

    Original file (FD-2014-00560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRS)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefconta insavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00286

    Original file (FD-2014-00286.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof dischargeto Honorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leading tothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underits...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00155

    Original file (FD-2014-00155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorableandchangeofauthorityfordischarge,andchange ofreenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservice record. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothedischarge.